March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Search





About
This Blog
The author
     My Webpage
     My Faculty Profile
     My Curriculum Vitae (CV)
     Contact me


Archives
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003


Categories


Links to my published articles online
List of Publications with Full Citations

2006
Adolescent Diary Weblogs and the Unseen Audience

2005
Conversations in the Blogosphere: An Analysis "from the Bottom Up". Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38) Best Paper Nominee.

Weblogs as a bridging genre

2004
Bridging the Gap: A Genre Analysis of Weblogs. Winner of the 2004 EduBlog Awards as best paper.

Common Visual Design Elements of Weblogs

Women and Children Last: The Discursive Construction of Weblogs

Time until my next publication submission deadline
27 March 2006 23:59:59 UTC-0500


Links to my conference papers online
2005
The Performativity of Naming: Adolescent Weblog Names as Metaphor

2004
Buxom Girls and Boys in Baseball Hats: Adolescent Avatars in Graphical Chat Spaces

Time until my next conference submission deadline
31 March 2006 23:59:59 UTC-0500


Bibliographies
Adolescents and Teens Online Bibiliography
Last updated July 8, 2005.

Weblog and Blog Bibliography
Last Updated November 22, 2005.

My CiteULike Page

My Book2
New books are added but reading status is rarely accurate.


January 11, 2006

National De-Lurking Week

I have been amuzed by all of the academic blog posts I have seen announcing National De-Lurking Month Week. One after another they implore, cajole, and order lurkers on their blogs to uncloak themselves by commenting. However this set of tactics completely misses what lurking is all about.

Lurkers are the vast majority of any sites traffic. They come they read they think about or comment on with other folks or giggle or whatever appropriate response is required, to the posts they read. And then they move on. Lurkers are the meat of running a website, the glue that holds a community together.

I've always found it interesting in discussions of online community that lurkers are looked down up on as somehow being takers but never givers. I would, and have, suggested that those that feel that way should visit a town meeting in some small community. If you do take on this terrestrial task you will find that the vast majority of those in attendance are talking among themselves, or not at all, very few stand to talk to those running the meeting.

De-lurking is like standing up at that meeting. Most people don't add their comments and that is fine by me. I like lurkers...but then again I am a professional lurker. So if you lurk come on over, sit down read a few posts, think about them, come back for more in the future, all of that is welcome here. And no one will force you to comment unless you want to, of course comments are welcome if you have something to say...we like that too.

Posted by prolurkr at January 11, 2006 09:20 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.professional-lurker.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/1259

Comments

National De-Lurker Month? What a concept!

I don't send letters to the authors of most books I read. I probably average one Letter to the Editor for every, oh, 2000 magazines/journals I read.

So why would I comment at every blog that I read? If there's a conversation that I can add value to, great--but good readers add value to. And that's what lurkers are: Good readers who don't happen to feel like being writers in this instance.

[So far, this notion seems to have ducked the biblioblogosphere, unless you count your weblog in that category.]

Posted by: walt at January 11, 2006 11:18 AM

Jenny Preece talks in a couple of papers (and in person) about how even the term "lurker" is pejorative. She likes "legitmate peripheral participant" because these people *do* contribute to the community. She's also published a few studies of why people lurk: mostly for very reasonable reasons.

Posted by: Christina Pikas at January 11, 2006 12:04 PM

Sorry Christina, and no offense to Jenny, but any time you have to replace a single word term with a three word term my alarms start going off.

I like the term "lurker" I figure anyone who wants to see it negatively is well...misinformed. I lurk on close to two hundred feeds and I can probably count those I have commented on on one hand...well maybe part of a second. I like to lurk...it's how I learn things. And believe me I feel no less a part of the community on the blogs I have never commented on.

Posted by: Lois at January 11, 2006 02:40 PM

Walt as with most things I am a boundary spanner...you can count me in the biblioblogosphere even though my degree is in information science and I won't get to wear yellow on my gown. *w*

Posted by: Lois at January 11, 2006 02:42 PM

Hi, Lois & others.

I don't see lurking as a negative thing, but I am still trying to understand lurking, as it's different from my style. I tend to inject myself into interaction spaces. Also, I am still not completely comfortable with broadcasting my life into an online space, yet I still do so... I often want to know more about people reading my blog because I view blogging as a relational activity. I hope that if I share about my life, I will get to learn more about the lives of others in return. It's not like keeping score or anything -- people don't HAVE to share equally. It's my hope that if I am vulnerable with others, they will, in turn, open up to me. Yet, it is important for me to recognize that the needs and motivations of others who visit online spaces can be very different from mine.

I met a lurker at my blog at a conference in October, but when I met her I didn't know she was a lurker until we talked for a while and then we figured it out. We met at the conference, having known each other barely as acquaintances prior to the conferences, talked about work and life, and then she put together that I was a blogger and that she read my blog OFTEN. !!! It was a good experience; she shared what she got out of reading the blogs, why she doesn't comment (in her case, it felt like joining into a conversation that she didn't she herself being a part of, I think), and so forth.

That said, there are plenty of blogs I do lurk on because I am intimidated by the community that already seems to exist there. Also, I agree with those above who said that's impossible to participate on all of the blogs you read.

Interesting topic.

oh, and of course we must admit that we are encouraging people to delurk because we selfishly love comments. :) I really like how New Kid talks about this issue in her post about National DeLurking Week.

- B*

Posted by: bright star (B*) at January 11, 2006 03:53 PM

Ah well, since my graduate degree doesn't exist, and I still count myself in the biblioblogosphere (a term that I helped to solidify, unfortunate though it may be), I think you count as well.

I did mean National De-lurker Week, not Month!

Here's a one-word synonym for blog lurker that has no pejorative connotations I can think of:

Reader.

Posted by: walt at January 11, 2006 04:57 PM