Professional-Lurker blog was listed as the Feedster Feed of the Day on November 13, 2005.
Professional-Lurker blog was the recipient of Best Research Based Blog High Esteem ranking in the 2004 EduBlog Awards.
The blogger is co-author of the 2004 EduBlog Awards winning paper Bridging the Gap: A Genre Analysis of Weblogs.
Mary-Chapin Carpenter
Harry Chapin
The Chieftains
Emma Christian
Connie Dover
Joseph Fire Crow
Dan Fogelberg
Nanci Griffith
Tim Grimm
Dan Hill
Al Jarreau
Joshua Kadison
Carole King
Kevin Locke
Bill Miller
Van Morrison
John Prine
Boz Scaggs
Andrew Vasquez
The Waifs
Dar Williams

Folk Alley: Folk Music, Traditional Music, Celtic Music, and World Music an online radio station

particularly the NPR channels.

Prolurkr's last.fm Recent Tracks
... Internetwork Ecology ...
Book Collector
Detagger
Dover Electronic Clip Art Series (CD-ROM)
FileMaker Pro
GoBinder
HTTrack Website Copier
Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count
MindMap
Mint
MyBlogLog
Reference Manager
RocketPost
Ultra Recall
ViceVersa
Visited Countries
Visited States (United States)
WB Editor
Web Frequency Indexer
The Word Meter
See Prolurker's Personal List at MyProgs
George Bernard Shaw (1856 - 1950), Man and Superman (1903) "Maxims for Revolutionists"
You see things; and you say, 'Why?' But I dream things that never were; and I say, "Why not?"
George Bernard Shaw (1856 - 1950), "Back to Methuselah" (1921), part 1, act 1
Don't let fear convince you that you're too weak to have courage. Fear is the opportunity for courage, not the proof of cowardice.
McCain, John (2004, September). In Search of Courage: Finding the Courage Within You. FastCompany, 51-56.
In the search for character and commitment, we must rid ourselves of our inherited, even cherished biases and prejudices. Character, ability and intelligence are not concentrated in one sex over the other, nor in persons with certain accents or in certain races or in persons holding degrees from some universities over others. When we indulge ourselves in such irrational prejudices, we damage ourselves most of all and ultimately assure ourselves of failure in competition with those more open and less biased.
J. Irwin Miller, Chairman of the Board (1951-1977), Cummins Inc. From 1983 letter about diversity at the company.
| Add prolurker to your Google Toolbar |
| Technorati Cosmos |
My Amazon.com Wishlist

My blog is worth $21,452.52.
How much is your blog worth?
Digital JAZ
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2
Syndicate this site (XML)
September 26, 2005
CFP - Academic Session: "A Tremendous Shattering of Tradition": Reconsidering Walter Benjamin's 'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction'
CFP: Academic Session: "A Tremendous Shattering of Tradition": Reconsidering Walter Benjamin's 'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction'
(AAH Annual Conference, University of Leeds, UK, 4/6/2006 - 4/8/2006)
Session convenors: Patricia Allmer, MIRIAD, Manchester Metropolitan University, Cavendish North Building, Cavendish Street, Manchester, M15 6BG, sears@allmer.fsnet.co.uk
John Sears, Manchester Metropolitan University (Cheshire),
Interdisciplinary Studies, Crewe Green Road, Crewe, Cheshire, CW1 5DU,
J.Sears@mmu.ac.uk
Session Abstract:
This session will commemorate the 70th anniversary of the publication of Walter Benjamin's seminal essay 'Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit', translated into English by Harry Zohn in 1968 (year of revolutionary discontent) as 'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction'.
In 1936 the essay offered a challenge not only to Fascist appropriations of art, but also to conventional Marxist aesthetics as well as to phenomenological theorisations of art - witness its problematic reception by Adorno and others, its expressed discontent with what it sees as depoliticised modes of aesthetic engagement, and its analysis of "a world without aura" (Rodolphe GaschE9). These challenges are repeated in different ways in the essay's influence on the turbulent intellectual scene of the late 1960s. It has contributed significantly to the development of both Marxist and postmodernist theorisations of culture, as well as to the ongoing art-historical reassessment of the art work and its roles in contemporary media-dominated societies. In short, Benjamin's essay constitutes a major, if continually contested, contribution to debates about modernism and postmodernism that retain their currency in the age of digital reproduction, "a period when politics as spectacle has become a commonplace in our televisual world", as Susan Buck-Morss argues.
The essay's perennial appeal to discontented Marxist and other modes of reading modern and postmodern art may constitute one line of enquiry. Papers are also sought that will explore the essay's continuing significance for contemporary theories, practices and histories of art. The essay has exerted a profound influence on the work of key theorists (eg October) and practitioners (Warhol, Burgin, Sherman); papers may wish to explore or assess aspects or examples of this influence. Other topics might include Benjamin's notions of the aura of the art work, of originality, of reproduction; changes in the significance for art history of mechanical and other forms of reproduction; the implications and consequences of accommodating photography and film (Benjamin's exemplary modern media) within the configurations of art historical practice, and the essay's contribution to current debates about inter- and trans-disciplinarity (the 'contents' of the discipline of art history); the essay-form itself as exemplifying politicised, interventionist aesthetic practices of modernist and postmodernist malcontents; the essay itself considered as a work of art, enacting its own arguments in fragmentary, inconsistent forms; and considerations of the various publication contexts and initial critical receptions of and
responses to Benjamin's essay.
Papers are invited that address these and other topics in relation to reconsiderations of Benjamin's essay.
Details for Submission of Proposals:
Papers must not exceed 30 minutes. Please email a 200 word abstract to the session convenors before the 11th November 2005. Include the title of your paper, your full name and contact details and institutional affiliation (if applicable).
Please note that the call for papers for all the conference sessions has been published in the June edition of the AAH Bulletin and at the AAH website: www.aah.org.uk
Posted by prolurkr at September 26, 2005 08:40 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.professional-lurker.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/986
